Topics In Demand
Notification
New

No notification found.

Why Zero Trust is Non-Negotiable for GCCs in 2025
Why Zero Trust is Non-Negotiable for GCCs in 2025

40

0

 

A decade ago, Global Capability Centers (GCCs) were back-office engines humming quietly in the background, handling IT support, processing payroll, and managing customer service desks. They existed on the periphery of enterprise strategy, defined primarily by cost arbitrage and scale. Fast forward to 2025, and the picture is radically different: GCCs are the strategic brain trusts of multinational enterprises, driving digital transformation, harnessing artificial intelligence, and most critically, owning cybersecurity. 

Nowhere is this transformation more visible, or vital, than in India. With over 1,800 active GCCs generating $64.6 billion in annual revenues, the country has emerged as the undisputed global nerve center for enterprise technology and innovation. But it’s not just about scale or cost. 

According to Everest Group, 78% of new GCCs are designed with digital-first mandates, where cybersecurity is a top strategic priority. BFSI GCCs are now operating as fully-fledged Centers of Excellence (CoEs), slashing incident response times by 40% through AI-driven threat intelligence and automated detection. 

This shift isn’t driven by compliance or operational efficiency. It’s existential. In a world of escalating digital threats, hybrid workforces, and state-sponsored cyber warfare, the security posture of a GCC can determine the fate of its parent enterprise. 

The Death of the Castle-and-Moat: Why Zero Trust Now 

For decades, enterprise security followed the “castle-and-moat” model: build a strong perimeter and trust everything inside. But in a post-COVID, multi-cloud, borderless world, the perimeter is dead

Enter Zero Trust Architecture (ZTA), a philosophy and framework built on the principle: "Never trust, always verify." Every user, device, and workload is presumed hostile until authenticated, continuously validated, and explicitly authorized. 

This model is a business imperative

The Business Case for Zero Trust: The GCC Equation 

Let’s break down why ZTA is non-negotiable for GCCs in 2025: 

1. Hybrid Work = Higher Risk 

As hybrid and remote models become permanent, the enterprise attack surface has exploded. According to Cobalt, data breaches involving remote work cost companies $173,000 more on average. 

With thousands of distributed endpoints, contractors, third-party vendors, and remote employees, GCCs must assume breach and enforce least-privilege access. ZTA ensures that no user or device can access more than absolutely necessary, reducing risk and blast radius dramatically. 

2. Cloud Sprawl Demands Micro-Segmentation 

Nearly 60% of Indian GCCs now operate in hybrid cloud environments. As workloads shift between AWS, Azure, and private clouds, traditional firewalls become meaningless. 

ZTA’s micro-segmentation acts like digital compartments in a submarine; if one part is compromised, the damage is contained. It prevents lateral movement, a key tactic in ransomware attacks and advanced persistent threats (APTs). 

3. Compliance Isn’t Optional, It’s a Mandate 

India’s Digital Personal Data Protection Act (DPDPA) 2023, along with GDPR, RBI Cybersecurity Framework, and global SOC 2 standards, require airtight data governance. 

4. The Cost of Doing Nothing is Catastrophic 

The IBM 2023 Cost of a Data Breach Report is unequivocal: enterprises with Zero Trust save an average of $1.76 million per breach. For large-scale GCCs handling PII, IP, and financial data, those savings are often the difference between continuity and collapse. 

Why India’s GCCs Are Leading the Cyber Arms Race 

India is setting the pace. Here's why the subcontinent is becoming the cybersecurity crucible of the modern enterprise: 

1. Talent Depth and Velocity 

India’s cybersecurity industry is on a steep growth curve, projected to be worth ₹28,000 crores by 2025. The rise of professional certifications like CISSP, CEH, CISM, and OSCP is fueling a world-class workforce that is not just technically adept but also understands business risk. 

Enterprise GCCs are now prioritizing onshore cyber labs, investing in threat intelligence teams and DevSecOps squads, creating a self-reinforcing ecosystem of talent, innovation, and scalability. 

2. Governmental Thrust 

The National Cybersecurity Reference Framework (NCRF) and sectoral guidelines from RBI, SEBI, and MeitY are no longer suggestive rather definitive. Legislation like DPDPA enforces consequences for lax data governance, catalyzing CISO-driven transformation from the board level down. 

3. Global Recognition and Ecosystem Credibility 

India’s jump from 47th to 10th in the UN’s ITU Global Cybersecurity Index is more than symbolic. It signals a maturing ecosystem—where GCCs, regulators, academia, and startups are collaborating to build cyber resilience at a systemic level. 

The Road Ahead: Challenges and the AI-Powered Security Stack 

The momentum is real, but so are the obstacles. 

1. Shadow IT Is Growing 

As business units push for agility, unauthorized tools and platforms are proliferating. A staggering 45% of GCCs reported at least one incident of shadow IT in 2023. 

ZTA frameworks can contain and neutralize shadow IT through automated discovery, policy enforcement, and behavioral anomaly detection—all without throttling innovation. 

2. Talent Gaps and the Upskilling Imperative 

Despite India’s tech talent surplus, cybersecurity demand still outpaces supply. The solution isn’t just hiring, it’s upskilling. GCCs must establish cyber academies, partner with universities, and invest in applied training on Zero Trust, cloud security, and threat hunting. 

3. Upfront Costs and ROI Myopia 

ZTA isn’t a checkbox solution. It requires architectural redesign, new tooling, and cultural buy-in. But the ROI is provable and quantifiable. 

The alternative, a major breach, comes with regulatory fines, reputational damage, and operational collapse. Leaders must recognize: ZTA is an insurance for enterprise continuity. 

The Next Frontier: AI + SASE = Secure by Design 

As we move into the second half of this decade, two forces will define the security architecture of GCCs: 

AI-Driven Threat Intelligence 

Tools like Cisco Talos, Palo Alto Cortex, and Microsoft Defender XDR are no longer reactive, they’re predictive. AI models trained on billions of attack signatures can anticipate zero-day threats, flag anomalies, and enable autonomous response in milliseconds. 

This is cybersecurity at the speed of business. 

Secure Access Service Edge (SASE) 

The convergence of ZTA and SASE is set to revolutionize secure remote access. By combining SD-WAN capabilities with integrated threat prevention, SASE delivers secure, context-aware connectivity to users anywhere, anytime. 

For GCCs managing multi-geo operations, this is a game-changer. 

The Bottom Line: GCCs Must Lead, or Get Left Behind 

GCCs are no longer cost centers. They are cyber innovation (no-follow)  cores, business continuity engines, and strategic risk mitigators

Enterprises that continue to treat them as back-office utilities will fall behind. The ones that empower them as digital vanguards will thrive. 

By 2025, every GCC must: 

  • Embed Zero Trust as a foundational architecture, not a bolt-on. 
  • Use AI and automation to counter real-time threats. 
  • Drive global cybersecurity strategy, not merely execute HQ policies. 

 

Final Thought 

“GCCs that treat cybersecurity as a cost center will become the cost. Those that treat it as a strategic weapon will dominate.” 

The perimeter is gone. The threats are multiplying. And the battleground is digital. The future belongs to the bold and secure.

 


That the contents of third-party articles/blogs published here on the website, and the interpretation of all information in the article/blogs such as data, maps, numbers, opinions etc. displayed in the article/blogs and views or the opinions expressed within the content are solely of the author's; and do not reflect the opinions and beliefs of NASSCOM or its affiliates in any manner. NASSCOM does not take any liability w.r.t. content in any manner and will not be liable in any manner whatsoever for any kind of liability arising out of any act, error or omission. The contents of third-party article/blogs published, are provided solely as convenience; and the presence of these articles/blogs should not, under any circumstances, be considered as an endorsement of the contents by NASSCOM in any manner; and if you chose to access these articles/blogs , you do so at your own risk.


© Copyright nasscom. All Rights Reserved.