Topics In Demand
Notification
New

No notification found.

LangChain vs LlamaIndex: Which one should you use and when
LangChain vs LlamaIndex: Which one should you use and when

July 23, 2025

21

0

When I first started building LLM-powered apps, two libraries consistently emerged: LangChain and LlamaIndex. At first, they seemed to be doing the same thing. But the deeper I explored, the more I realized that they solve very different problems and understanding that is the key to building better AI apps. In this blog, I'll break down what each library does, provide real-world use cases, and help you determine which one to use when, along with some code examples to make it all click.

  • LlamaIndex is excellent when you want to connect LLMs to your own data (like PDFs, Notion, databases, etc.).
  • LangChain is ideal for building chains, doing multi-step reasoning, and orchestrating agent-style workflows.
  • You can, and must use both together.

What is LangChain?

LangChain is a framework for the logic and orchestration of large language models that lets you:

  • Build multi-step chains (e.g., extract → calculate → summarize)
  • Use tools like search engines , APIs, and calculators
  • Manage memory, prompt templates, and agents

It's the go-to if your LLM needs to "do things” not just answer a one-off question.

For a deeper dive into how LangChain can help structure clean, object-based responses from LLMs, check out this guide on using LangChain for structured outputs.

When should you use LangChain

Use LangChain when:

  • You need chained logic — e.g., extract → transform → analyze
  • You're building agent-style apps (e.g., AI that uses tools or browses the web)
  • You want more control over prompt engineering, memory, or dynamic flows

Example: Multi-step reasoning with LangChain

Takeaway: LangChain is perfect when your app needs to think in steps or use tools.

What is LlamaIndex?

LlamaIndex, previously known as GPT Index, assists large language models in communicating with your data to handle tasks like:

  • Chunking and indexing your documents (PDFs, Markdown, SQL, etc.)
  • Retrieving relevant data using semantic search
  • Providing that information to the LLM for improved answers

If LangChain represents the brain's wiring, then LlamaIndex serves as its long-term memory.

 

When should you use LlamaIndex

Use LlamaIndex when:

  • You have custom or private data (like PDFs, database rows, support articles)
  • You want retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) — fetching relevant context before asking the model
  • You care about how data is chunked, indexed, and retrieved

Example: Query a PDF with LlamaIndex

Takeaway: LlamaIndex shines when you want your LLM to "read" your data before answering.

Can you use LangChain and LlamaIndex together?

Absolutely, many production apps use LangChain and LlamaIndex together. You can use LlamaIndex to fetch relevant information, and then let LangChain handle logic, reasoning, or tool-use on top of that.

Example: LlamaIndex + LangChain

Takeaway: The best of both worlds — LlamaIndex provides the facts, while LangChain manages the process.

Comparing LlamaIndex vs LangChain

IMAGE FROM NITIN

How to choose between LangChain and LlamaIndex?

Here’s how I personally decide:

  • Just need your LLM to communicate with your data? → LlamaIndex
  • Need reasoning, tools, and multi-step logic? → LangChain
  • Want both intelligence + context? → Combine them

Don’t overthink it. These tools solve different problems, and they’re better together.

Final thoughts

Both LangChain and LlamaIndex are evolving fast. The community is growing, the documentation is getting better, and the integration keeps improving.

My advice? Experiment. Try both. Combine them.

Have you built something cool with LangChain or LlamaIndex? Found an edge case where one outperformed the other? I’d love to learn how you’re using them. Need support with using LangChain and LlamaIndex? Contact experts to discuss a solution that best fits your business.


That the contents of third-party articles/blogs published here on the website, and the interpretation of all information in the article/blogs such as data, maps, numbers, opinions etc. displayed in the article/blogs and views or the opinions expressed within the content are solely of the author's; and do not reflect the opinions and beliefs of NASSCOM or its affiliates in any manner. NASSCOM does not take any liability w.r.t. content in any manner and will not be liable in any manner whatsoever for any kind of liability arising out of any act, error or omission. The contents of third-party article/blogs published, are provided solely as convenience; and the presence of these articles/blogs should not, under any circumstances, be considered as an endorsement of the contents by NASSCOM in any manner; and if you chose to access these articles/blogs , you do so at your own risk.


© Copyright nasscom. All Rights Reserved.